IRA KATZNELSON WHEN AFFIRMATIVE ACTION WAS WHITE PDF
June 29, 2020 | by admin
WHEN AFFIRMATIVE ACTION WAS WHITE An Untold History of Racial Inequality in Twentieth-Century America. By Ira Katznelson. pp. When Affirmative Action Was White has ratings and 81 reviews. ” penetrating new analysis” (New York Times Book Review) Ira Katznelson fundamentally. When Affirmative Action Was White: An Untold History of Racial Inequality in One can speculate that Ira Katznelson has been listening to some version of this .
|Published (Last):||5 October 2007|
|PDF File Size:||8.16 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||12.3 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
It can occasionally be a difficult issue to finesse. I was presiding over a classroom of about twenty undergraduate students, trying desperately to moderate a discussion on the legacies of the civil rights movement. It started the way it normally does, “The movement gave blacks equality; I don’t see how you can approach it as anything other than a victory. It solved America’s race problem. Just look at our inner cities and crime among black youth and poverty among minorities.
Civil rights was about more than the right to vote! The exchange seems so familiar because it cuts across so many of the fault lines that define contemporary public discourse. Call it the difference between red states and blue states, the suburbs and the city, or white individuals and black individuals; many Americans simply disagree over how the United States should remember and interpret the social revolutions of the s and early s. One can speculate that Ira Katznelson has been listening to some version of this exchange since he first entered academia in Having written extensively on urban politics and liberalism, his new book, When Affirmative Action Was Whitejumps into the fray by analyzing the issue of affirmative action.
The book is held together by one overarching theme. As New Deal politicians began constructing government programs to deal with welfare, work, and war in the s and s, they deliberately excluded or treated differently the vast majority of African Americans.
The central reason, according to Katznelson, was because Democratic leaders needed the support of southern representatives in Congress to pass their ambitious legislative programs. Framing the entire New Deal coalition as a Faustian bargain between white progressives and white segregationists, the author shows how the South used its influence to gain local control over federally-funded government projects.
The result was that federal aid whhen the South became contingent on southern Jim Crow. At the exact moment when the “activist” state was giving whites the tools to create a robust middle class, African Americans were being kagznelson isolated from the benefits of public assistance.
Stated differently, “affirmative action” did not emerge as a new program in the late s. According to Katznelson, it had deep roots in the s katznelspn played an affirmatuve role in exacerbating the socio-economic chasm between whites and blacks in the post-World War II years. When Affirmative Action Was White elaborates on this core theme in four stages. Whej, the author looks at how African Americans were denied access to economic relief during the New Deal.
Although many federal officials understood that black whkte were the hardest hit group during the Great Depression, a full 65 percent of African Americans were denied access to social security benefits, government grants, elderly poor assistance, and unemployment insurance.
Administered by local politicians throughout the South, New Deal relief programs were simply not given to the vast majority of African Americans. The result was the deepening of black rural poverty.
Similarly, southern segregationists skewed the natural direction of worker reform. Positioning the National Labor Relations Act and the Fair Labor Standards Act as key moments in America’s modern labor movement, Katznelson shows how southern congressmen incorporated provisions into legislation that exempted agricultural and domestic labor. Consequently, while white workers throughout acion United States gained the means to organize and improve their standard of living, the sectors dominated by African American workers were left to languish in further poverty.
When blacks finally gained access to some industrial jobs during World War II, southern congressmen conveniently abandoned labor reform and helped pass the Republican Party’s Taft-Hartley Act According to Katznelson, Taft-Hartley not only placated the labor movement in the South, but it also decoupled the burgeoning connections between civil rights agitation and demands for economic equality. The final two prongs of When Affirmative Action Was White look at the wartime experiences of African Americans and the discriminatory dimensions of the G.
While white ethnics from eastern and southern Europe experienced katzneoson revolutionary transformation in their status as American citizens because of their participation in World War II, blacks experienced segregation in the armed forces. In the years that followed the war this exclusion resulted in a cruel catch, as most African Affirmattive were denied access to the resources of the Selective Service Irra Act because they had not served in the wehn.
The federal government stepped in to pay mortgages for white veterans and upgrade educational institutions throughout the country, but most African Americans watched these developments from the sidelines. The cumulative effect of these policies was the widening of the economic gap along racial lines.
When affirmative action was white | History and Policy
When Affirmative Action Was Affirmtive concludes with the recommendation that contemporary American policymakers deal with these legacies by reexamining Lyndon Johnson’s original vision for affirmative action. Relying heavily on Johnson’s Howard University Commencement Address, the author posits that the 37th President of the United States understood the importance of ambitiously attacking the root causes of discrimination. Katznelson suggests, toward this end, that rather than providing additional resources for a thriving black middle class, the federal government should create a temporary aid program to uplift the urban and rural poor who have been most afflicted by racial discrimination.
An extension of affirmative action, in the author’s mind, would end the need for state-sponsored compensation within a generation and create a katnelson “color-blind” society.
When Affirmative Action Was White offers a worthwhile contribution to the debate over affirmative action, but not without shortcomings. First, Katznelson’s argument would be more compelling with a better exposition of how New Deal and Fair Deal programs secured the social well-being of white ethnic groups.
Demonstrating the discriminatory features of federal programs is not necessarily the same thing as proving that they functioned as “affirmative action” for eastern and southern Europeans. The author briefly comments on the experiences of Catholics and Jews in his chapter on World War II; these comments could be elaborated and deepened. On a more substantial level, Katznelson’s emphasis on the culpability of southern representatives in Congress is not completely satisfactory.
As a range of scholarship has demonstrated in recent years, racism has been as prevalent and debilitating in Northern urban centers as in Southern agricultural areas. His argument is appealing because it suggests that America’s racial difficulties could have been avoided with better decisions at the federal level, but it is too simplistic to be taken seriously. A more complex framework would consider the interaction between government policy and the northern migration of blacks in the middle years of the twentieth century.
Katznelson believes very passionately that robust public policy could have redressed America’s racial chasm.
Stated more explicitly, the author longs for a time when liberalism informed the principles of the federal government. It seems ironic, against this backdrop, that Katznelson devotes only a single sentence to the social upheavals that undermined Johnson’s expansive vision for affirmative action during the s and s.
By ignoring the events that have reoriented American politics and placed affirmative action supporters on the defensive, the author’s suggestions come off as sincere and well-informed, but somewhat unrealistic. To state the obvious, the whiye of liberalism no longer shape policymaking in Washington, DC. It is unlikely that disagreements over affirmative action will diminish in the near future.
When Affirmative Action Was White offers much for those hoping to participate in this debate; its message should be taken as a serious reminder that state-sponsored racial discrimination has affected all Americans. Whether Katznelson’s book will definitively “turn the tide” against affirmative action’s opponents, katznekson, will remain to be seen.
Until then, I will continue moderating my classroom debates and watching the differences between Americans grow. Current Events in Historical Perspective gratefully acknowledges the generous support of the Stanton Foundation. Skip to main content. The Ohio State University. International Relations Religion Education Sports. Hot off the Press. Review Printer Friendly Version.
When Affirmative Action Was White | W. W. Norton & Company
When Affirmative Action Was White: Review avtion Ryan Irwin. Reviewed by Ryan Irwin You may also be interested in our article: Detroit and the Fate of Urban America. To discuss and comment on this review, please visit our Facebook page.
North Korea in the Nuclear Age. Journeys to the Other Shore: Muslim and Western Travelers in Search of Knowledge. College of Arts and Sciences.